رؤى حول أداء المجلة واتجاهات النشر: تحليل كمي لبيانات JOPAS من عام 2017 إلى 2024

[1] B.-C. Björk, ‘Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: A literature survey’, Prof. Inf., vol. 28, no. 4, p. e280407, 2019, doi: 10.3145/epi.2019.jul.07.

[2] C. R. Sugimoto, V. Larivière, C. Ni, and B. Cronin, ‘Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis’, J. Informetr., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 897–906, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.007.

[3] A. B. Rosenkrantz and M. Harisinghani, ‘Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR’, Am. J. Roentgenol., vol. 204, no. 6, pp. 1152–1156, 2015, doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13944.

[4] J. Huisman and J. Smits, ‘Duration and quality of the peer review process: The author’s perspective’, Scientometrics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 633–650, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5.

[5] B. Biondi, C. B. Barrett, M. Mazzocchi, A. Ando, D. Harvey, and M. Mallory, ‘Journal submissions, review and editorial decision patterns during initial COVID-19 restrictions’, Food Policy, vol. 105, p. 102167, 2021.

[6] C. W. Fox and C. E. T. Paine, ‘Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution’, Ecol. Evol., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 3599–3619, 2019, doi: 10.1002/ece3.4993.

[7] R. L. Lyman, ‘A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer Review’, J. Sch. Publ., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 211–220, 2013, doi: 10.3138/jsp.44.3.001.

[8] Y. Pigott and D. A. Gordon, ‘The Journal—A More Rapid Publication Process’, J. Rheumatol., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–2, 2011.

[9] O. H. Azar, ‘The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make It More Efficient?’, Am. Econ., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2006, doi: 10.1177/056943450605000103.

[10] M. Kovanis, R. Porcher, P. Ravaud, and L. Trinquart, ‘Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system’, Scientometrics, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 695–715, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1800-6.

[11] A. Weber, M. D. Vivanco, and J. L. Toca-Herrera, ‘Application of self-organizing maps to AFM-based viscoelastic characterization of breast cancer cell mechanics’, Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 3087, 2023.

[12] S. Aviv-Reuven and A. Rosenfeld, ‘Publication patterns’ changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis’, Scientometrics, vol. 126, no. 8, pp. 6761–6784, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-04059-x.

[13] L. R. Forti, L. A. Solino, and J. K. Szabo, ‘Trade-off between urgency and reduced editorial capacity affect publication speed in ecological and medical journals during 2020’, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00920-9.

[14] D. Murray et al., ‘Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review’, bioRxiv, p. 400515, 2019, doi: 10.1101/400515.

[15] M. C. Scott, K. T. Morrison, R. Gillette, B. Harnke, J. S. Kutner, and K. L. Colborn, ‘Primary Author Characteristics Associated with Publication in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management’, J. Pain Symptom Manage., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 105-111.e1, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.10.014.

[16] M. K. Rooney et al., ‘Trends in publication speed of radiation oncology research from 2010 to 2019’, Adv. Radiat. Oncol., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 100863, 2022.

[17] R. B. Schäfer et al., ‘Perspectives from early career researchers on the publication process in ecology’, Freshw. Biol., vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 2405–2412, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02673.x.