Interception of Skeletal Class 3 Malocclusion with Frankle 3 Appliance in Late Mixed Dentition: A Case Report

Authors

  • U. B. Rajasekaran Orthodontics, Sebha University, Sebha, Libya
  • Khalled Abdulla Department of Orthodontics, Sebha University, Sebha, Libya

Keywords:

Class III malocclusion, Frankel appliance (FR-3), Interceptive orthodontics, Mixed dentition, Case report

Abstract

Class III malocclusion can be classified as dentoalveolar, skeletal or functional, which will determine the prognosis. The aim of this article was to describe and discuss a clinical case with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with frankle 3 appliance and fixed mechanotherapy and followed up for two years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics, ed. 4. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishing Inc., 1988:183-195.

Kanas RJ, Carapezza L, Kanas SJ. Treatment classification of Class III malocclusions. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008: 33(2); 89-100.

Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Ortho Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126(5):555-568.

Janson G, Souza JEP, Barros SEC, Andrade P Jr, Nakamura AY. Orthodontic treatment alternative to a Class III subdivision malocclusion. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17(4): 354-63.

Godt A, Zeyher C, Schatz-Maier D, Göz G. Early treatment to correct Class III relations with or without face masks. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(1):44-9.

Costa Pinho TM, Ustrell Torrent JM, Correia Pinto JG. Orthodontic camouflage in the case of a skeletal Class III malocclusion. World J Orthod 2004; 5(3); 213-223.

Fränkel R, Müller M. The uprighting effect of the Fränkel appliance on the mandibular canines and premolars during eruption. AJODO. 1987;92(2):109–116.

Graber TM, Neumann B. Removable orthodontic appliances. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Co; 1984.

Yang KH. Frankel appliance type III: correct fabrication and case report of skeletal Class III malocclusion. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996 Summer; 20(4):281-92.

Rushforth CD, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator. Br J Orthod. 1999 Jun;26(2):127-34.

Nihat K, Mevlüt C,Hüsamettin O. Effects of the functional regulator III on profile changes in subjects with maxillary deficiency. Eur J Orthod (2010) 32(6): 729-

John S. K, Thomas R T. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by Function Regulators (FR-2 and FR-3). Eur J Orthod (1989) 11 (3): 235-242.

Downloads

Published

2012-06-01

How to Cite

1.
Interception of Skeletal Class 3 Malocclusion with Frankle 3 Appliance in Late Mixed Dentition: A Case Report. J Med Sci (Sebha) [Internet]. 2012 Jun. 1 [cited 2026 Oct. 15];11(2):75-80. Available from: https://www.sebhau.edu.ly/journal/joms/article/view/5054

Similar Articles

21-30 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.