Acute Ureteric Calculus Obstruction: Unenhanced Spiral CT Versus MR Urography and Abdominal Radiograph

Emhmed M. Saaid

Authors

Emhmed M. Saaid Radiology Department, Sebha Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Sebha University, Sebha, Libya

Keywords:

Ureteric calculus, Ureteric obstruction, Unenhanced spiral CT, MR urography, Plain abdominal radiograph (KUB)

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to compare the performance of unenhanced spiral CT to the combination of MR urography (MRU) and plain abdominal radiography (KUB) in patients suspected of having acute calculus ureteric obstruction. 64 patients with suspected acute calculus ureteric obstruction were evaluated. The presence of perirenal fluid, presence and level of ureteric obstruction and calculi were assessed on both techniques. 44 out of 64 (69%) patients had acute calculus ureteric obstruction based on clinical, radiographic or surgical findings. MRU showed perirenal fluid in acute ureteric obstruction (77%) with a greater sensitivity than CT showed stranding (45%). The combination of fluid and ureteric dilation on MRU showed a sensitivity of 93% (CT 80%), specificity of 95% (CT 85%), and accuracy of 94% (CT 81%).

KUB showed ureteric calculi in 21/29 (72%) of patients with calculi seen by CT. Overall, MRU/KUB revealed 2.4 abnormalities per acutely obstructed ureter compared with 1.8 abnormalities detected by CT. MRU/KUB using HASTE sequences can diagnose the presence of acute calculus ureteric obstruction with similar accuracy to spiral CT. This technique has less observer variability and is more accurate than CT in detecting evidence of obstruction such as perirenal fluid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Drach GW. Urinary lithiasis; etiology, diagnosis and medical management. In: Walsh PC, Staney TA, Vaughan ED, editors. Campbell’s urology (6th edn). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1992:2085– 156.

Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Kyuran AC, Kirk RE, Verga M, Glickman MG, et al. Acute flank pain: comparison of noncontrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 1995;194:789–94.

Smith RC, Verga M, Dalrymple N, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs on helical unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1109–13.

Heneghan JP, Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC. Soft tissue ‘‘rim’’ sign in the diagnosis of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 1997;202:709–11.

Regan F, Bohlman ME, Khazan R, Rodriguez R, Haakh H. MR urography using half-fourier acquisition single shot turbo spin-echo [HASTE] in the assessment of ureteric obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1115–20.

Aerts P, Van Hoe L, Bosmans H, Oyen R, Marchal G, Baert AL. Breath-hold MR urography using the HASTE technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:543–5.

Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics (4th edn). Boston, MA: Duxbury Press, 1995.

Phelan JS, Rochester MN, King BF, Ali AT, Welch TJ, llstrup DM, et al. Spiral CT in the detection of urinary stone disease: a prospective blinded comparison of soft copy vs hard copy interpretations. Radiology 1998;209[P]:452.

Bell TV, Fenlon HM, Davison BD, Ahari HK, Hussain S. Unenhanced helical CT criteria to differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths. Radiology 1998; 207: 363–7.

Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Boridy IC, Takahashi N, Benson GS, Goldman SM. Unenhanced helical CT of ureterolithiasis; value of the tissue rim sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1997;168:997–1000.